Tooling Product News

Multi-Process Disease in Hot Runner Molds

By Rod Groleau, Chairman RJG, Inc.

Hot runner molds are great. Everyone knows that. We eliminate runners, grinding them and reprocess them. So what’s the issue? All hot runner molds are not created equal. We have all seen the application where using a hot runner mold resulted in more scrap and more regrind instead of its elimination. Why would this be? It seems really simple. You heat the channel where the plastic flows, pressurize the injection unit and the plastic flows into each cavity. So what is so complicated? Why wouldn’t that just always happen in a repeatable way? Well, this plastic stuff that we push into these wonderful molds simply doesn’t behave like normal material. The only thing that we use regularly that behaves a little bit like plastic is catsup. You know what happens with a new bottle of catsup. You try to make it flow – it doesn’t. Then, look out – when it flows, it all comes at once! Plastic behaves the same way but to a much greater degree.

So what does this have to do with hot runner molds? If a hot runner mold gets pressurized and flow does not start in all flow channels at the same time, something sort of bizarre happens. The plastic starts to flow in some channels and it flows very easily for a while. As pressure builds, other cavities start to fill. Many times the ones that were originally flowing stop flowing. The ones that get filled early don’t pack very well. Why is that? It is because this plastic that becomes very easy to flow while moving becomes very hard to pack once it stops flowing. Cavities filling last usually pack first.

We have to step back a little bit and talk about why this happens. It is due to non-Newtonian flow. When plastic flows, the very long molecules that make up plastic align in the direction of flow. This untangles them and drops the viscosity. This allows plastic, which is relatively viscous, to flow much like water. The faster it flows the easier it goes. If a hot runner mold is designed in such a way that flow doesn’t initiate in all of the channels at the same time, we have problems. Some cavities fill first and pack hard and some cavities fill last and pack easily. Also, in a mold that is so-called balanced, where flow channels and directions are all the same from one cavity to another, there is a high possibility that the flow patterns will change over time. This is caused by the on- and-off heating of the tips, causing more or less resistance to flow in different drops over time. The end result: cavities which fill first on one shot do not fill the same on the next shot. Or in other words, the fill balance in hot runner molds tends to change from shot to shot. This is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Multi-Process Disease - cavities which fill
first on one shot do not fill the same on the next shot

We term this phenomenon “Multi-Process Disease”. All hot runner molds potentially have this problem but to different degrees. I have
spent a great deal of time in my career thinking about how we can eliminate Multi-Process Disease. The only sure ways are to build
single cavity molds or use sequential valve gating, which only allows
one to flow at a time.

How to test for Multi-Process Disease

When someone asks me what I think of hot runner molds, I say that I like hot runner molds if they behave. "Behave" means that the process doesn’t change over time, as it does with Multi-Process Disease. There are two easy tests to detect Multi-Process Disease. The first is a dynamic test where short shots (known as “fill only” shots) are intentionally made over a period of time, perhaps once every hour, while a mold is running. This can be done in the early stages of qualifying the tool (the earlier the better actually) so that effects can be anticipated. If the short shots are not the same every time, the fill pattern is changing. The second approach is to monitor the individual cavity weights periodically, say once per hour. This shows the distribution of plastic in each of the cavities. This is then plotted on a graph as shown in Figure 2. This plot also must include the average part weight (shown in red) in the middle of the pack.

Figure 2: A mold without Multi-Process Disease - all cavities' weights go up or go down in unison, indicating that there is really only one process to control here

What we would like to see is that the average of all cavities trends the same as each individual cavity, as is shown in Figure 2 for a cold runner mold. What this means is that all cavities' weights go up or go down in unison, indicating that there is really only one process to control here. Often, however, we see a graph that looks like Figure 3, where part weights for each cavity vary independent of one another. In this case we have multiple processes. This 4-cavity mold has four distinct processes or cavities that vary independently. Many times, as you can see, some of these cavities trend completely counter to other ones. As part weights go up in one area of the mold they go down in other areas of the mold.

Figure 3: A mold with Multi-Process Disease - part weights for each cavity vary independent of one another, meaning that each cavity behaves as a separate process.

A mold that does this can be highly problematic. Any mold that has Multi-Process Disease will almost assuredly make defective parts and allow them to escape downstream to the customer. Currently, the only way I know to eliminate these escapes is to monitor pressure in each cavity with a cavity pressure sensor. This will detect when the pressure distribution has changed so that parts can be contained while corrective action is initiated.

Often the mold builder is the scapegoat for a Multi-Process Disease situation. However, studies have found that it is a complex interaction between the mold, the manifold, the material, the machine, and the mold temperature controller that all contribute to the situation.

It is important that everyone involved understand this phenomenon and work together to make it manageable. There are no silver bullets and simply pointing fingers will never make the problem go away. Instead, it may be more beneficial to consider this: each cavity of a mold can be controlled if independently actuated valve gates are installed. This is the only way to positively eliminate this problem.

Rod Groleau is Chairman of RJG, Inc., based in Traverse City, Michigan. RJG serves the plastics industry with sensors, process control and training solutions. For more information, call 231-947-3111 or visit www.rjginc.com.

Be a TPN Guest Speaker! If you'd like to submit an article for a future issue of the TPN, please contact Editor Cyndi Kustush at editor@tooling-product-news.com for editorial guidelines. Be sure to provide complete contact information and any proposed topics or ideas.